Dear Tom and Ray:
When I first learned to drive, a million years ago, my father (who knew nothing about cars) advised me to always drive a manual transmission because they handle better, are easier to repair, are cheaper, get better mileage, etc. Being an obedient daughter, I have owned and driven only manual-transmission cars all these years. Also, I needed the boost I got from the cool factor of a woman driving a stick shift (men are so transparent). But now I'm older and am tired of all that shifting. I'm getting ready to trade in my 2003 Subaru Forester for a new one, and I want an automatic — but will I be losing out on all the good things, like control and economy? Or does that no longer really apply, with today's car engineering? I don't want to do anything that might make me any less cool than I already am. Can I make the switch? My father isn't around any longer to advise me, but I know he would trust the opinions of his favorite car guys. — Nina
Tom: Get the automatic, Nina. You have our blessing.
Ray: The things your father cites, while true in his day, are either no longer true or are not compelling arguments anymore. Let's take them one at a time.
Tom: Myth 1: Manual transmissions get better mileage. While this certainly was true for a long time, today's automatic transmissions pretty much match the mileage you can get with manual transmissions.
Ray: Older automatics had a lot of "slippage," or inefficiency, built into them. But much of that is gone since there are now computer controls, lock-up torque converters and things like dual clutches. Some automatics now have six, seven, eight or even infinitely variable speeds, giving them an advantage in mileage over their manual counterparts.
Tom: Myth 2: A manual transmission gives you more control over your car. This usually refers to being able to employ engine braking by downshifting or delaying an upshift. But you know what? You can do those things with an automatic transmission, too. And many computer-controlled automatics now have a "manual mode" that allows you to shift up and down through the gears manually anyway. So, if you want to, you can still drive to Duluth in second gear and get seven miles per gallon.
Ray: Plus, with the widespread adoption of computerized safety enhancements such as stability control, traction control and anti-lock brakes, new cars are very well-controlled these days, no matter what kind of transmission you're using.
Tom: Myth 3: Manual transmissions are cheaper and easier to repair. Well, that one's true. On cars that offer you a manual transmission option, it's often $1,000 less than the automatic. And should your automatic need a rebuild, it's expensive, because it's like doing one of those 14,000-piece jigsaw puzzles without the box-top picture.
Ray: However, many automatic transmissions last for the life of the vehicle, whereas a manual transmission will require at least one, if not more, $1,000 clutch replacements during a car's life. So the costs really are about the same.
Tom: Myth 4: Manual transmissions are more fun. That's probably the strongest argument for getting a manual transmission. And if you feel that way, you should get one and enjoy it.
Ray: But for some people, they're not more fun — people who live in cities, for instance, and have to creep along in traffic every day. Or people who'd rather have their right hand free to change the radio station or administer a dope slap to a recalcitrant preteen in a passenger seat.
Tom: But it's really a matter of personal preference now. There are no good economic or mechanical reasons to choose a manual over an automatic anymore, Nina. So be as shiftless as you like. Dad would approve.
(Car Talk is a nationally syndicated column by automotive experts (and brothers) Tom and Ray Magliozzi. Write to them at the Car Talk website.)


10 Comments
By Lennerd on August 25, 2012 3:04 AM
Like T & R say, I liked manual transmissions through most of my young adulthood. Then I moved to Los Angeles and commuted 17 miles and in the afternoon, those 17 miles ocassionally took 90 minutes. I got really tired of that clutch, first gear, brake to a stop, repeat endlessly driving. Next car was an automatic and I've never wanted another manual.
By Peter on August 27, 2012 10:07 AM
I still think it's worth learning to DRIVE a manual, even if you decide not to own one. Among other things, you can save several hundred dollars a week on a rental car for your European vacation.
By Girly Girl on August 28, 2012 8:11 PM
But - you MUST have a manual if it's a sports car!
By Richard on August 30, 2012 6:42 AM
More and more (foreign) car companies are introducing 6-speed manuals now. My 18 year-old Civic, with its 5-speed, is going to my 17 yr.-old son, when I buy my 2013, Mazda 3 hatchback; 6-speed manual and 40 MPG. Gonna be so uch fun, even in the city.
By Rastro on September 5, 2012 10:05 PM
If I could only get an automatic, my next hog would... nah!
By GoCougs on September 9, 2012 10:45 AM
One lasting advantage of the manual transmission is the ability to compression start if your battery dies. Maybe a small advantage, but its been nearly a life-saving feature a couple times in my driving life. In an emergency, just press the clutch, throw it into 1st or 2nd, take off the e-brake, let the car roll a little, pop the clutch, press the gas, and drive off!
By Leslie on September 10, 2012 7:20 AM
And I believe that manual transmission cars are stolen less often.
By silence dogood on September 11, 2012 10:34 PM
I take issue with the assertion that automatics last the life of the car. Perhaps they were confusing the two. Every automatic I've owned and those I know who have owned them have required a rebuild somewhere around 100k give or take. It's the manual transmission that lasts the life of the car, not the automatic.
By jana on September 20, 2012 12:36 PM
Agree with silence dogood. I drove a honda for over 300k; never had a problem with manual transmission, hadn't had to rebuild it. The cluth lasted that long as well.
By Ian on September 22, 2012 2:00 PM
First thing I want to mention is that the advice given only applies to newer cars. Older cars? It still holds true, and it's an assumption that a person is only going to be looking at a newer car.
Second thing I want to say is that many people, even those who have been driving for more than twenty years have no clue how to drive in specific situations. One of the biggest problems today is bumper-to-bumper traffic, and the cause of bumper-to-bumper traffic is not the number of cars on the road. The main cause of the problem in rush hour traffic is that people insist on tailgating. You want to change lanes and can't because there is no room for you to maneuver your car into, because the twit in the lane next to you is 6 inches off the car in front of them. LEAVE SPACE. Even when the traffic is only going 10 miles an hour on that 70 miles an hour freeway? Leave three or four car lengths (or even more) between you and the car in front of you. ALWAYS. Three things this accomplishes. The traffic will not slow down nearly as much, you virtually never have to touch the brakes, and you can change lanes without arguement.
Tom and Ray are knowledgable about cars, I give them that, but the reality is, a lot of the advice they give is outdated, and based on what they learned... When they learned to drive.